Emerging Market Bonds: Can the Hot Start In 2017 Continue?

Article provided by Kathy A. Jones, Senior Vice President, Chief Fixed Income Strategist, Schwab Center for Financial Research of Charles Schwab.

Emerging market bonds were big winners among fixed income asset classes in the first quarter. The total return for the Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets USD Aggregate Bond Index rose an impressive 3.3%, compared with 0.8% for the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Bonds denominated in local currencies performed even better, returning 6.8%.

Much of the price gain this year represents a rebound from late 2016. The combination of higher U.S. interest rates, a strengthening dollar and the threat of U.S. trade tariffs weighed on EM bonds in the fourth quarter, but concerns about all three issues waned in early 2017.

Emerging market bonds rebounded in the first quarter

Why does the strength of the U.S. dollar and U.S. interest rates matter to EM bonds? For issuers of U.S. dollar denominated debt, a rise in the dollar may make it more costly to repay. While investors still receive interest and principal in dollars, the bond may selloff if there is concern about the issuer’s ability to pay. The impact on investors who purchase local currency EM debt is more direct. A rise in the dollar means investors would receive less interest and principal because of the reduced value of the local currency.

Meanwhile, higher U.S. interest rates tend to draw investors toward U.S. Treasury bonds, which tend to be less risky than EM bonds.

Sentiment toward emerging markets shifted in the first quarter as it became clear that the path of Federal Reserve rate hikes would remain gradual and the implementation of pro-growth fiscal policies and protectionist trade policies might be delayed or possibly watered down. As the dollar slipped by about 3% from its 14-year peak in January and bond yields declined globally, the relatively high yields offered by emerging market bonds attracted investors.

Slim compensation for higher risk

While the yields on emerging market bonds are attractive relative to those in major developed market countries, valuations aren’t cheap. After the sharp rally, the average option-adjusted spread (OAS) of the Bloomberg Barclay’s Emerging Markets USD Aggregate Bond Index is roughly 270 basis points,¹ near the low set in 2013 before the dollar’s 20% rise. The narrow spread means investors aren’t getting as much compensation for the risks in EM bonds as they were a few months ago. Since EM bonds have historically been far more volatile than U.S. Treasuries, we think investors should be cautious about increasing exposure when the yield spread is so narrow.

The spread between EM bonds and U.S. Treasuries is below its four-year average

Meanwhile, risks remain. The Fed is still on the path to raising interest rates, which could lead to a resumption of the U.S. dollar’s rally and reduce the attractiveness of EM bonds. During the dollar’s recent bull market from mid-2014 to mid-January 2017, EM bonds denominated in local currencies underperformed. As the table below shows, from the end of May 2014 through March 2017, local currency EM bonds produced a total return of -5.9%, compared with a positive 12.9% return for dollar-denominated EM bonds and 6.2% for the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The dollar’s appreciation against EM currencies was the major factor weighing on returns in local currency EM bond markets.

Local currency EM bonds underperformed during the recent U.S. dollar bull market

Political and economic risks in EM countries also make us cautious. The Trump administration recently announced steps to examine trade practices of countries with which the U.S. has its largest deficits, such as Mexico and China, with the threat of imposing trade restrictions. A slowdown in global trade can weigh disproportionately on EM countries because many rely on exports for much of their gross domestic product growth. Moreover, some of the largest issuers of bonds in the emerging market universe are sovereign governments facing political and economic challenges. Mexico has elections coming up this year and Brazil is encountering political challenges. South Africa’s economy is in turmoil and its bonds have been downgraded to below investment grade.

Neutral looks good to us

While we are cautious about EM bonds after the recent rally, we are not suggesting that investors reduce allocations. Our view is neutral. The historically high yields and diversification benefits of EM bonds are good reasons to include them in a diversified portfolio, for investors who can tolerate some volatility. We usually suggest no more than a 20% allocation to aggressive income investments within a fixed income portfolio.

¹ One basis point is equal to 1/100th of 1%, or 0.01%; 250 basis points is equal to 2.5%.

 The opinions expressed in post are those of the author and not necessarily the same as those of Aquinas Capital Advisors LLC. Aquinas Capital Advisors LLC did not assist in the preparation of the material and makes no guarantee as to its accuracy or the reliability of the sources used for its preparation.

Important Disclosures

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market or economic conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.

Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed-income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications and other factors. Lower-rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk.

International investments involve additional risks, which include differences in financial accounting standards, currency fluctuations, geopolitical risk, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate this risk.

Diversification strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses, and cannot be invested in directly.

Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market-value-weighted index of taxable investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage backed securities, with maturities of one year or more.

Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets USD Aggregate Bond Index includes USD-denominated debt from emerging markets in the following regions: Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia. As with other fixed income benchmarks provided by Barclays, the index is rules-based, allowing for an unbiased view of the marketplace and easy replicability.

Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex USD Index provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-rate debt markets. The two major components of this index are the Pan-European Aggregate, and the Asian-Pacific Aggregate Indices.

Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Currency Government Index is designed to provide a broad measure of the performance of local currency emerging markets debt. Classification as an emerging market is rules-based and reviewed on an annual basis using World Bank income group and International Monetary Fund country classifications.